Is it feasible to combine Quality, Environmental, and Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems successfully? Once upon a time, there was a huge chasm between the Quality department and the Safety, Health, and Environment (SHE) department, and they seldom engaged. Because OHSAS 18001 (the precursor of ISO 45001) was designed to be compatible with ISO 14001, the integration of the Environmental Management System (EMS) and the Occupational Health and Safety Management System (OH&SMS) was always regarded as viable. However, while ISO 9001 was recognized as the "mother" standard, it was seen as something quite different.
The introduction of the High-Level Structure, which became applicable for any ISO standards issued after September 2015, has altered the landscape. Whereas previously each ISO technical committee (TC) had some leeway in determining the form of their standard, they must now follow Annex SL, the new guideline for ISO standards authors. It requires all new and revised standards to have the same 10-clause structure and core content. Suddenly, in 2015, ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 were speaking the same language, and it no longer made sense to operate at arm's length. It was now the OH&S that was falling behind since ISO 45001 took another two and a half years to be issued. Learn more about Requirements and Benefitsof ISO go to ISO 9001 Requirements and Benefits
The apparent beginning point is to establish the context of the organization. This involves defining the system's desired objectives/outputs, as well as the internal and external challenges that will affect their attainment, as well as the relevant involved parties' requirements and expectations. It also entails determining the system's scope. This can be done once for all three standards while keeping in mind that specifics (intended results, interested parties, etc.) will vary depending on the actual scope: for example, a QMS intended outcome of maintaining a consistent taste in a food product, an EMS intended outcome of meeting license specifications for effluent discharge, and the goal of OHS is to reduce the hazards associated with handling hazardous chemicals.
Once these fundamentals are in place, an integrated policy that contains all obligatory and particular obligations related to the scope may be developed: satisfying consumer expectations (for example, keeping a constant flavor that customers enjoy), preventing injury and illness (for example, by updating obsolete equipment), preserving the environment (for example, by using recycled packaging), and meeting compliance duties. Relation and difference between ISO 9001 and ISO 22000 to learn more about the difference between ISO 9001 and ISO 22000
The following step is planning, which entails identifying the risks and opportunities (related to quality, the environment, or occupational health and safety) and taking the necessary actions to address them to achieve the desired results/outcomes, as well as establishing objectives and plans to achieve them. In comparison, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 place a greater emphasis on planning, with aspect and impact identification and significance evaluation (ISO 14001) and hazard identification and risk assessment (ISO 45001) requiring significant work. All companies in Dubai and UAE have the plan to get the ISO Certification in Dubai and rest of UAE.
The most significant difference between ISO 9001 and the other two systems is found in the area of operation (clause 8). Clause 8 of ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 is short and to the point, covering comparable concerns under operational planning and control and emergency preparedness and response. ISO 9001, on the other hand, goes into extensive depth. This is because there are several operational components to ensuring that the product satisfies requirements.
Except for the added sub-parts Customer focus in ISO 9001and Consultation and involvement of workers in ISO 45001, the Leadership portions are fairly similar. Both reflect the important positions of the two standards' principal stakeholders - one from outside and one from within the company. Because the primary interested party is present within the organization, consultation and involvement are a repeating topic throughout the ISO 45001 standard. ISO 9001 seeks consumer input to improve customer satisfaction.
Performance assessment methods will also be simplified to integrate all IMS needs for monitoring and measuring, compliance evaluation, internal audit, and management review. It is worth noting that OH&S has an extra need for an incident inquiry. The extra inputs relevant to each standard, such as trends in OH&S incidents and the results of consultation and participation, will simply be required for management review. ISO 14001 certification has the advantage for customers.
The procedure will be comparable whether ISO 45001 is added to an existing QMS and EMS or all three are created from scratch because there are obvious building elements that fit together. The beauty of creating a single integrated management system (IMS) is that, while the detected risks may be numerous and diverse, there is frequently convergence in the measures taken to address them. Quality, environmental, and health and safety issues may all be addressed by the same operational procedures. For instance, regular equipment maintenance. This explains why ensuring that the systems are linked with the company's business operations is so important.ISO 14001 help implementation help wastewater treatment
In other situations, the TCs retain their own pet words, such as "intended results" in ISO 9001 being substituted by "intended outcomes" in ISO 14001 and ISO 45001. ISO 45001 uses the word "legal and other requirements" instead of the "preferred" term "compliance responsibilities." Fortunately, people may disregard this and use terms that they are familiar with. This has made combining various standards simple. After all, the aim is always to increase performance. Similarities and Difference between ISO 14001 and 45001 to learn more about what is difference between ISO 14001 and 45001