In any ISO 9001 QMS (Quality Management System) certified organization or company, distinguishing and addressing most important quality aspects is vital to performance, and so, to the success of both system and process conformity with ISO 9001. With legislation, and concerns relating to your organization's employees, customers, shareholders, stakeholders and therefore the local community, there'll be several things to contemplate when dealing with your quality aspect and distinguishing what aspects could also be more or less important. Therefore, it is necessary that when you establish an quality aspect that's particularly vital to your organization, and most importantly you should have a substantial methodology or strategies to addressing these important quality aspects that alleviate, improves, or even get rid of the impact it has on the surroundings and quality as this is the prime motive of the ISO 9001 QMS certification standard. Therefore, how does one decide what quality aspects are most important and vital, and what strategies one should be able to employ to address them?
When addressing with different types of quality aspects, most of the time every organization will tend to rate or prioritize the chosen those quality aspects pertaining to ISO QMS on a scale of importance, as in aligning with any reasonably logical risk-based approach. So, therefore, it is important that the organization ought to establish aspects that could be a higher level of risk to the organization sooner or later, as opposed to those aspects which could result in risk either to a lesser extent or in the near future. Utilizing such a rating system will facilitate the organization sort out quality aspects, and so you can efficiently choose that are more important than others.
For instance, manufacturing or industrial plant's waste management and maintaining quality could both be known aspects for your organization and QMS, however, if your plant is producing more waste than expected then it is clearly indicated that the process are non-conforming when it comes to ISO QMS standard. And it would be prudent to make a decision that this kind of impact to the organization and quality and your stakeholders is more immediate and serious than a small degree of waste management in line with ISO 9001 certification principles. Therefore, it could be sensible to contemplate the emissions issue as a major quality risk, whereas the packaging issue may well be taken on a less serious note, and dealt later. If you don't use a substantial classification system to classify your organization’s most important quality aspects against those are less important, it might be wise to do.
Now that we have established a way to determine a major quality aspect, it is sensible to ascertain a method to make sure that they're dealt with efficiency. Provided that failure to mitigate or remove a major quality aspect could mean that objectives don't seem to be earned and continual improvement isn't evident, it's clear to envision that incorrect management of serious quality aspects could be a risk to the performance of the QMS. It is recommended to seek the help of ISO certification consultants so that they will let us examine some strategies of addressing this scenario: